-
Candace Owens’ Wackadoolery
The wackadoolery of Candace Owens is becoming wackadoodler and wackadoodler by the minute. It’s craaazy to watch. But to the people who are all enthralled by her charisma and her storytelling, it’s all wackadoodlicious. They are just lapping it all up like thirsty wackadoodligans at the last watering hole in the desert, sticking out their tongues for every drop as if it’s the only drink left on earth.
This woman is not just going around flinging out wild accusations with nothing to back it up and dirtying people’s lives, but she’s also manufacturing drama like a wackadoodle factory on overdrive.” It’s wild to see.
Everything is a conspiracy!
Don’t get me wrong, I believe there are legit conspiracies, especially over the last 6 years. I have no doubt in my mind conspiracies and trickery are real, by our Government and other high-profile players in our society. 51 intel officers right?…Joe Biden is the best he’s ever been…but come on, everything’s a conspiracy or not what it seems?
She claims that all of this is for Charlie Kirk, but man…like someone put it, this seems like the work of a vindictive woman, hell bent on destroying Charlie Kirk’s legacy, by tumbling down the organization he spent all these years building.
Did we miss something when we were all captivated by her charm? Did she wheel us in with her prior work, which no one can deny was really excellent, to do the bait and switch, to then turn into this impish mischief maker?
Watching her evolution is both fascinating and tragic, and exhausting. It just goes to show though, that you must never become a slave to personality. Always stick to principles. Because when you become devoted to personality, you could end up worshipping at the altar of wackadoodlery, like Owens’ devotees.
You risk becoming wackadoodle disciples, blindly cheering, dispensing reason and willingly heading toward the kool Ade that you know is laced with nothing good. It can only end one way.
Warning warning! Stick to principle everytime.
-
Egg On Their Faces: Democrats And The Epstein Files
All around, Democrats smeared egg on their own faces and rubbed it in like it was face cream. Their latest attempt to tie Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein has backfired spectacularly. For all their hooting and hollering, it is Democrats themselves who appear entangled in Epstein’s web.
Rep. Stacey Plaskett showed this in real time that time when she leaned on Epstein for cues during a congressional hearing to question Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer. Reports suggest she even initiated the call to Epstein to see how she could leverage information against Trump. Watching Democrats twist themselves into knots to explain this away reveals their hypocrisy in full view. Plaskett’s connections to Epsteing are noble, nothing to see here.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries followed suit. He tried to link Trump to a deceptive, heavily redacted email that conveniently hid information favorable to Trump. Yet Jeffries’ campaign was found to have solicited Epstein for money. When confronted, he went before cameras, looked earnestly into the lens, and called Rep. James Comer a “stone cold liar” for the claims. But the next day Comer returned to the House floor with receipts, proving Jeffries’ campaign had indeed reached out to Epstein for money.
The contrast was stark: Democrats released just ten pages of the Epstein files, deceptively redacted to paint Trump in a bad light, while Republicans released all 30,000 pages for public scrutiny. The Democrats’ selective editing concealed exculpatory information that would have cleared Trump. But that’s par for the course, birds fly, fish swim, Democrats lie.
And the egg keeps coming. Rep. Jasmine Crockett accused Republicans of soliciting Epstein’s money, only to be forced into retreat when even friendly media had to confront her misrepresentation. Each denial, each redaction, each false accusation only brings more incoming egg splattering across Democratic faces.
Here’s the point: Republicans are not more virtuous because of some special quality they possess. The difference is that Democrats are so consumed by Trump derangement, they keep setting traps that ensnare themselves. Their obsession blinds them, and in their desperation to destroy Trump, they reveal their own entanglements and hypocrisy.
Oh well one more attempt to get Trump fails. How often have we seen this story?
-
The Veteran’s Tribute
The veteran stands tall. He has served with honor. He has served with distinction. And he has served with devotion—unyielding, steadfast, and true.
He knows that many take his service for granted, that few truly understand the weight of sacrifice required to keep this nation free, to ensure it holds its place in the world. Yet he carries no regrets.
It is often a thankless duty, but he would do it all again. For the cost of not serving is far too great, far too costly.
He did it for her family. He did it for his friends. He did it for his nation.
He bears the scars of war, but he also sees the fruit of his labor, the freedom, the safety, the promise, the future. It brings him comfort and a measure of peace.
Though the load has been heavy, he feels the weight was worth carrying, side by side with those who shared the burden. The path was often difficult, and unthinkably hard, but he is grateful to have walked it.
Today, we recognize him. Today we honor her. Today, we remember them.
To the veteran, happy Veteran’s Day.
-
The Left Hates Truth
Here is an oft repeated mantra of mine—and yes, it bears repeating one more time. Some may roll their eyes, but folks, understand this: repetition is necessary for people to grasp the gravity of the situation. This is not just a talking point. It’s a foundational truth. The left hates truth. That’s not hyperbole. It’s a reality baked into their ideology.
Truth is incompatible with their worldview. Lies are not just tools—they’re structural supports. If they embraced truth, their entire ideological framework would collapse. And make no mistake: preserving that framework matters more to them than the damage it causes. They will defend it at all costs.
Case in point: Karine Jean-Pierre. She’s on a media tour promoting her book, and it’s a masterclass in gaslighting. She claims (without blinking) that she saw no cognitive decline in Joe Biden during her time as press secretary. She’s still pushing the Joe Scarborough line: “Biden was sharp as a tack.”
But in a rare moment of actual journalism, Brianna Keilar of CNN pressed her on this. And what did Karine do? She doubled down. Despite everything we’ve seen with our own eyes, despite the mountain of evidence, she looked into the camera and lied.
When cornered, they always pivot. She said, “It’s important that we talk about where we are today. We are in an unprecedented situation.” Then came the deflection: Trump is using the military unlawfully, he’s rounding up brown people—even citizens. Blah, blah, blah. Lies with reckless abandon.
But dig deeper. What’s really happening here? She wants you to believe that her lies don’t matter. That holding her accountable is a distraction. Why? Because, she insists, the real threat is in the White House now. Worse than anything before. In other words: “But Trump…”
Do you get it, folks? Do you see the pattern? This is why they lie. They have to. Their ideology demands it. Truth is their kryptonite.
-
The Epstein Client List
What’s the deal with the Epstein client list?
I think the Trump DOJ fumbled the ball badly on this one—but not necessarily for the reason most people think. Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, and others made a big deal out of the so-called Epstein client list while doing the rounds on the talking-head circuit. They made noise, they sounded alarms, they built suspense. They invested a whole lot of political capital into the idea that the list exists and that, if given the chance, they’d blow it wide open. They talked a really big game.
Now let me just say—I was never one to put all my eggs in the Epstein client list basket. A list of names, in isolation, doesn’t prove anything. If you’re going to make accusations, you need real evidence. You need to back claims with hard data, not just vibes. Emotion can be part of an argument, sure, but it can’t be the foundation. It has to serve the case, not be the case. So regardless of how angry or disgusted one may feel about the idea of this list, it was never going to be enough to bring down the so-called deep state cabal. Not on its own. You’d need way more than that to actually convictanyone of the crimes people believe were committed.
But then there were whispers—loud ones—not just about a list, but about Epstein having surveillance everywhere. Hidden cameras throughout his properties. Footage of the powerful and influential doing the unthinkable. Recordings used as leverage. Blackmail. Control.
Even after the Trump team came into office, figures like Pam Bondi were still out there teasing this stuff—hinting at explosive evidence that would finally expose the machinery behind Epstein’s operation and its connection to entrenched power structures.
So what happened?
Maybe they over-promised based on what they thought they’d find, only to realize later there was, as the saying goes, “no there there.” Maybe the material existed but turned out to be weak, inconclusive, or unusable. Or maybe—just maybe—the outgoing administration destroyed the goods before the incoming team ever had a chance to see them. After all, we know the swamp plays dirty. We saw how the January 6 committee handled evidence. They are not above wiping things clean to protect their own.
But let’s be real—this whole thing stinks. And not just a little. This is full-on swamp stench. Rotten-corpse-in-Florida-swamp-level stench. And the people telling us to just move along, like nothing ever happened, they’re engaging in gaslighting so bold, so brazen, it makes Mayorkas, Fauci, Joe Scarborough, and the entire MSNBC lineup look like straight shooters, truth tellers of the highest integrity.
Now we’re supposed to believe there’s no list? Nothing to see here? No videos, no hard drives, no dirt—just poof, gone? Really?
That’s awfully convenient for a lot of powerful people.
And what about the big talk? The promised reckoning? The come-to-Jesus moment they swore was just around the corner? Are we really supposed to accept that it was all just smoke? After all the buildup, we get Pam Bondi telling us, with a straight face, there is no list—and nothing else worth talking about? Not to mention, watching President Trump get so upset the other day when someone asked about the Epstein list was jus weird.
What!?
Whaaaat!?
Just in case you didn’t hear me, what? Seriously, what?
Nah, bruh. That doesn’t fly.
They need to be out there facing the music—answering real questions from the press, including t“enemy of the people” wing of the media. They put themselves in this position. They made the promises. They stoked the fire. They told us they had the goods. They can’t just brush it all off now and expect everyone to move on like nothing happened. It doesn’t work that way.
-
What Was the United States to Do With a Nuclear-Armed Iran?
Let’s suppose, for the sake of argument, that Iran really was on the path to developing a nuclear weapon. How should the world have responded — and more specifically, what should the United States have done in light of that?
Here’s the reality we have to confront:
For over four decades, Iran has stood as the world’s most consistent and aggressive state sponsor of terrorism. From Hezbollah to Hamas to Shiite militias in Iraq, Iran has exported and exploited violence, instability, and death across the globe. The United States has been one of it’s two prime targets that entire time — not in a metaphorical manner, but literally and explicitly. Iran’s leaders routinely refer to America as “the Great Satan,” and “Death to America” is not just a symbolic chant in Tehran — it’s a political slogan, a unifying rallying call, and a deeply held conviction.
Likewise, Israel — “the Little Satan” in their worldview — remains the prime target of Iranian-backed terror. On October 7, 2023, we saw the horrifying consequences of that hatred when Hamas, an Iranian proxy funded and supported by Iran, carried out a brutal massacre of Israeli civilians. That wasn’t an outlier. It was part of a long-standing Iranian objective: to see the Jewish state wiped off the face of the earth.
So let’s ask the question plainly: What happens when this regime — one that funds terror, calls for genocide, chants for America’s death, and has shown it’s willingness to engage in horrific violence against it’s enemies — gets its hands on a nuclear weapon?
Would that be acceptable to anyone?
Let’s be clear: A nuclear-armed Iran wouldn’t simply be a threat to its neighbors — it would be a global menace and a bone-chilling, cold-sweat-inducing nightmare. It would embolden terror groups under the protection of an Iranian nuclear canopy. It would set off a nuclear arms race in one of the most volatile and destabilized regions on earth-the Middle East.
Imagine if you will, a nuclear armed Iran with that kind of leverage, and how it could use that pressure to extort nations, trample internal dissent, and threaten its enemies with obliteration — while defiantly daring the world to do something about it.
We’ve seen firsthand with Hamas that the threat of annihilation — even the near certainty of defeat at the hands of a superior force — is not enough to dissuade religious zealots from pursuing their objectives. Their commitment to their cause overrides the fear of destruction.
Considering all of these factors, could the United States afford to passively react to such a threat? How catastrophic would be the cost of such indifference?
On the other hand, one could argue that a preemptive military action may be necessary. The stakes are indeed high, and if Iran really was just days from developing a nuclear weapon, the danger it would have posed could not be overstated. A nuclear-armed Iran, driven by religious ideological extremism and a decades-long track record of sponsoring terrorism in pursuit of its goals, would shift the global balance of power at its core.
A world with a nuclear armed Iran would place both regional allies and American interests under the constant looming threat of nuclear blackmail, perhaps even worse, to be haunted by the real possibility of catastrophic violence. Iran has not hidden ther intentions. They are crystal clear. They want death to America. They want death to Israel. That’s not rhetoric-it is their state goal.
In view of all these considerations, is there any question whether or not the United States should take whatever actions are necessary to prevent a numclear armed Iran.
-
That Time In American History When We Were Almost Wiped Out By A Medical Threat
Does anyone remember that long bygone dystopian era in America when people were told to stay locked up in their homes, and not gather socially because of world ending medical threat? It was a dark time. People were not allowed to walk on beaches is some places. They were not permitted to go out on their boats, or meet on athletic fields. People risked getting arrested by the police if they disobeyed these mandates from on high.
They were told that to do any of these activities meant endangering the lives of their fellow Americans. In some locations, families were not allowed to meet in their homes in numbers more than the state decided was ok to have.
People were even banned from assembling in their places of worship. In one state they were told if they did gather for services they were not allowed to sing or chant.
Pharmacies refused to fill certain prescriptions recommended by board certified, practicing physicians because the federal government, their agencies and other government officials waged a disinformation war against the use of some medicines.
The people leading the safety brigade even told us the medication that has been in use and prescribed to treat various ailments for decades was not safe. The safety and security assured everyone that some of these medications were dangerous and meant to treat animals, horses in particular.
Wouldn’t you know it? Some dying patients were even denied life saving medical care at some treatment facilities because the patients refused to take a certain jab on their arms (a jab that has the highest number of negative side effects than any we have seen in decades). Ethicists came out to lend their support and assure everyone that it was ok to deny life saving care to anyone who did not take the jab.
Old people in nursing homes on their dying beds were left to die on their beds alone and away from the loving presence and touch of friends and family. Thousands of them perished with broken hearts over being unable to hug their loved ones as they prepared to leave this world.
Those who questioned the draconian measures, and wondered if perhaps these remedies may actually be worse than the cure were targeted to be discredited. This happened regardless of the reputation of those asking the questions. Anyone who said this is not the way to go immediately had a laser placed on them for reputation destruction. Not even the expert opinions of medical professionals with decades long history of medical research, treatment, and stellar reputations were safe from attack by the state, for holding the wrong medical opinion during this wacko time.
The people in charge assured us these policies were for our own good. Shut up and let us protect you they insisted. We know what’s best for you.
It was a dark time in American history, as first responders, health care providers, military personnel and others were forced out of their jobs because they refused to allow a certain medical procedure that did not have a track record of effectiveness or safety.
As some continued to draw attention to the probable second and third order effects of these measures, the media, like rabid dogs attacked them.
Children were kept out of schools. Teachers refused to go back to the classroom. Children fell behind in their education and learning. Their socialization skills were badly negatively affected. Some younger children’s speech development appeared to have been set back by a couple years as a direct result of masks covering the mouths of everyone around them, and never seeing people’s lips move as they spoke.
Even as more and more information came out that people were being harmed by much of the response to the medical threat that used as the reason for all of these measures, those in charge doubled down.
It was all to keep us safe.
Perhaps worst of all, are the millions upon millions of people who died never getting the chance to try certain medications that many doctors who were treating patients had insisted works effectively in treating the disease.
Some celebrities and other high profile personalities treated people with absolute scorn, and wished death on citizens who did not buy in to the hysteria over the illness.
The President of the United States demonized citizens who were hesitant about taking the needle puncture. He called the so called medical threat that was about to doom all of mankind the disease of the unvaccinated.
It was a lie and they knew it.
Martha Stewart wanted unvaccinated people to be put on death row and executed for daring to be treated like free independent human beings questioning the blatant lies of those in power seeking more and more control over them.
Twitter commenters and others wished death on those who refused to get stuck by the needle. They were most vitriolic toward any high profile conservative who expressed vac cine hesitancy.
Social media powers went on a censorious rampage, and anyone who diverted from official, media or ruling class dogma was not allowed to speak freely on the platforms.
In the meanwhile the government was there all along, encouraging the hysteria, pushing the gloom and doom, predicting the apocalypse, while blaming the impending destruction of humanity on those who simply said, based on common sense, and unfolding evidence we need to reconsider our response to what was happening. That’s it.
They called those people science deniers, conspiracy theorists and other names. They ridiculed everyone and anyone who dared to question their narrative.
Democrats even tried to pass a bill that charged employers $700,000 per unvaccinated worker. Other lefties and Democrats raged at the unvaccinated demanding they be fired from their jobs, and many of those who resisted the tryanny did indeed lose there livelihoods, as their tormentors cheered.
There was a time during this whole disaster wehn there was some uncertainty about how to respond appropriately, but as more and more information came out, those in charge simply chose to lie to Americans. The lies were all in the effort to gain more control of people
Dont forget! It was all for our own good.
Drones, sheep, the incurious, and and low information disciples everywhere just obediently went along with it all, not questioning anything.
Never…never forget.
-
The Left Enemy Combatants And J6 Prisoners
Does anyone remember some years ago how the left came out with their hearts bleeding, dripping and leaving a trail of blood from all those bleeding hearts on behalf of enemy combatants located at Guantanamo Bay.
Keep in mind that enemy combatants are personnel on the battlefield who are often not willing to regard the rules of war. They often willingly engage in all kinds of actions on the battlefield that conventional forces are forbidden from practicing under accepted rules of war.
As such, enemy combatants do not fall under the customary rules of warfare that traditional soldiers and armies do.
The rules of the Geneva Convention do not apply to them.
In dealing with captured enemy combatants, the United States used what they called enhanced interrogation techniques to derive information from some of these combatants they captured on the battlefield.
The techniques were used on some of the most brutal terrorists who were behind vicious attacks on the United States and allies.
Some of the techniques used against these terrorists by the United States can certainly be described as harsh, but whether they qualify as torture is still up for debate.
Some have justified the treatment of these enemy combatants by arguing they do not fall under Geneva Convention rules, and have pointed out that enemy combatants do not operate with the same restraints as Soldiers on the battlefield, and are often willing to commit some of the most heinous, barbaric acts in pursuit of their ideology and goals.
The left became the champions of many of these vicious terrorists, and continued to call on the American government to treat these savages more humanely.
The news media featured on a loop, the alleged condition and circumstances of these enemy combatants demanding that the American Government stop the inhumane treatment of them.
Now lets switch to the J6 21 prisoners, rioters, and other offenders.
As more and more complaints come out about the harsh, and some say inhumane treatment of J6 prisoners by the American government, no one on the left or in the media shares the same concern or enthusiasm for the predicament of these American citizens, as they did for enemy combatants who were killing American Soldiers, and committing all kinds of atrocities on the battlefield against anyone who got in their way, including civilians.
Lawyers for many of these J6 prisoners have been complaing and trying to draw attention to their treatment. There have been accusations of prisoners being denied medical treatment, being placed in solitary for months from the inception of their incarceration, there have been accusations of torture of the prisoners, and lots of other wild accusations from lawyers, and family members about the prisoners treatment and welfare.
Some reports even claim that the government has broken with established precedents, and placed many J6 prisoners among the most violent offenders in the prisons.
Some of the people who have received these harsh senteces are said to have committed only the crime of walking into the Capitol or the Capitol building.
The treatment of the J6 prisoners is said to be so awful that many have turned to calling the facilities, the American Gulag.
You would know any of this though if all you listen to is establishment media.
The bleeding hearts who often take up the cause of some of the worst people like cop killers and Guantanamo bay detainees are silent on the treatment of the J6 prisoners. They have not looked in to the claims to see if any of it is true. They have not called on the government to ensure that J6 prisoners are treated humanely.
None of the usual suspects who have attached themselves to some of the worst causes in the past have shown any concern, or compassion for the treatment of the J6 prisoners.
They are quite happy to look on in silence as their political opponents continue to complain and try to draw attention to alleged abuse by the Federal Government, because in the eyes of the left, any abuse against their political opponents is justified.
So what is the point? The left will tolerate anything in the name of the cause. They will turn a blind eye to any evil (like alleged abuse of prisoners…or the sexualization of children for that matter) if it means advancing their ideology. They will make excuses all day long for bad behavior, because in the mind of the average leftist (not your traditional Democrats or liberal), anything goes when it comes to promoting the leftist agenda.
Don’t despair though. Continue to be vigilant. Speak truth, never give up and keep on pushing forward with a message of hope, and calling out corruption when needed. Do the work where necessary to pull the country back from the brink of the bottomless pit we seem to be heading for at warp speed.
-
Blacks And The Servile Devotion To The Democrat Party
For years, black Americans have been faithfully voting for the political party that utterly despises them, and takes them for granted.
It does not matter what the Democrat Party does, or has done to harm black people, black people then faithfully turn around mind boggling displays of Stockholm syndrome to vote for the people abuse them.
It’s the classic case of Stalin and the chicken, every two years with black Americans.
So many people hold a grudge against America, but they are passionately forgiving of the Democrat Party, the Party of the trail of tears, slavery, the KKK, denying 40 acres and a mule, Jim Crow, lynchings, the Rosewood massacre, the Ochoee massacre, the Helen massacre, the black Wall Street massacre, the party of Japanese internment camps, the party that resisted the 1957, and 1960 civil rights bills, and that filibustered the 1964 bill.
The Party that abused them for so many years continues to have their undying love and devotion.
Once again, all you have to do is look around and you will see Democrat hatred of black people manifested everywhere.
Just take a look at the latest blight that Democrats have inflicted on blacks with their defund the police policies, no cash bail and unfettered illegal immigration.
While Democrats like to point their fingers at their political opponents and claim to know what’s in their hearts by calling them racist, we actually have Democrat policies, and the actions of Democrats that have weighed so heavily on black people all across America.
Look at so many schools in the inner cities where many blacks attend. They are war zones. Students often can’t read or do math at the most basic level. The cities are plagued by violent crime, unemployment is high, and like Trump described many of them; they are rat infested hell holes.
Democrats have engineered policies that served to destroy black families via the welfare state, to the tune of 72 percent of black families having no fathers in the home.
None of that, over decades has been enough to get black people to consider switching their allegiance from the Democrat Party.
Not that any group of politicians will come in and automatically make everything all right, but goodness; blacks refuse to even try something different.
Look at what the Democrats did in the summer of 2020 when they stoked the summer of violence, chaos, mayhem and murder, all in the name of a lie that the police killed a black man because they hated him for no other reason than the color of his skin. It was a bold faced lie, and they knew it from beginning.
They stoked the fires anyway.
Who suffered the most from all of the violent wokeness?
Figure it out!
The devotion of black people was so aptly demonstrated in an iconic exchange between Joe Biden and a fella who calls himself Charlemagne tha god.
Charlemagne was interviewing then Presidential candidate Joe Biden and voicing his concerns about the way Democrats take blacks for granted, and Biden chided Charlamagne for stepping out of line.
Biden let him know that if he was having problems making a decision between him and then President Trump, “then you ain’t black.”
Charlemagne just took his whipping, shut his mouth, cleaned off his bleeding back from the lashes, and together with all the other blacks on the Democrat plantation, they dutifully voted for massa.
Massa loves us they insisted, and everyone else trying to get us to leave massa hates black people.
It’s just wild!
Many people are saying this election will be different. Blacks are going to vote for the other party in much larger numbers this time around.
It’s hard to believe given black people’s history of being gluttons for Democrat Party punishment.
Let’s see.
-
The Democrat Party’s Sabotage Of America’s Security
Why would the people in charge of enforcing the country’s laws allow the kind of chaos that we are seeing at the border?
For the last three years the Biden Administration made a conscious decision to allow people from all over the world to flood our borders, and invade the country, without the usual checks that we carry out on people wishing to come here.
The administration pulled back all of the policy measures that were very effective in stopping the invasive flow of illegal aliens during the last two years of the Trump administration.
The Biden Administration immediately stopped work on the border wall, ended the Remain In Mexico program, removed the strict asylum guidelines that were put in place to cut back on abuse of the asylum program, and they severed the agreements with Latin American countries that were put in place to combat the flow of the illegal caravans. We also saw Mexico bring an end to the deployment of 2400 troops that were put in place to help fight the problem from their end.
Let that sink in for one moment. People from all over the world who do not share our values and hate America need only show up at the Souther border, saunter into the the country, and then be released into the country’s interior. All of this with the approval of the Biden administration.
This is crazy.
Now, you do not need a degree in science or philosophy to understand that a country with no borders is a country at risk of compromising its security.
If anyone can walk into the country, guess what will happen? Anyone will walk into the country, and that is what is happening by the tens of thousands every single month.
One of the things that many keep drawing attention to is the number of single military age men, about whom we know nothing, from places like China, and the Middle East who are crossing the border, and then being given free rein in the country.
Are we to suppose that America’s enemies are going to look at this grand opportunity to inflict serious damage on the country, but they are not going to take advantage of it?
This is not going to end well, and unless there is a biblical proportion kind of miracle that prevents it, the repercussion of this open border policy is going to hit us really hard, and we’ll be wondering how the heck did this happening.
From the point where we now stand, it is easy to know and answer how.
The Democrat Party which has on several occasions shown its disdain for their country embarked on a mission to greatly sabotage America.
There is no other explanation.
They believe that immigration (legal and illegal) is the route to a permanent majority. They hope to import a new permanent underclass who’ll become so dependent on government that they’ll keep the Democrats in power.
Remember that people who break our laws are not beyond illegally voting. Also never forget about Democrat’s constant harping about a “path to citizenship” for illegal aliens.
The other thing the Democrat Party may be hoping to achieve is, so much chaos and crises that will be caused by their open borders policy, they’ll be able to pass laws that under normal circumstances will not stand a chance of passing. These laws would be in the name of keeping us safe.
Don’t forget the words of Rahm Emanuel and Hilary Clinton that we should never let a crisis go to waste. Don’t forget also the words of our northern wannabe dictator Justin Trudeau, who told us in no uncertain terms that the pandemic they all shamelessly lied about “provided them an opportunity for a reset, this is a chance to accelerate our pre pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change.” He may be in Canada but he is a classic representation of the left and what they stand for today.
Never doubt the left and their evil intentions. They tell us all the time with their own mouths what it is they hope to achieve, but many do not believe them for some reason.
Keep fighting these demons.
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Unpopular Politics 